tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3526277924846357205.post480698130908034803..comments2016-11-09T06:40:38.288-08:00Comments on Dal modello geocentrico al modello egocentrico.: LA LOGICA DELLA REALTA'.SFORZA MAUROhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14106483868240018280noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3526277924846357205.post-13401270900662118352015-08-19T03:07:03.129-07:002015-08-19T03:07:03.129-07:00Hi Mr. +Mezzetti,
I read Your statement here like...Hi Mr. +Mezzetti,<br /><br />I read Your statement here like several times ago. <br />Your like Your philosophy about, especially Italia, they are somehow even to my view about an renormative settlement of humans. <br /><br />_Duality exists because the motion_. Somehow the atomics produce an radiation by the theoretic of the so called 'mass-defect'. Think that mutual induce is an causal resp. an theoretical estimation about, otherwise there were no difference. "The materia had been accelerated anhow", that is why there is an opend horizon and closed orbit pathways. Human do not know the actual 'causal implicite quantum state' of univers is recognized. There had to be an apparatus 'SWP' to learn about the complex of dimensional implicte, like 'mass and density', electro- a.o. Apparatus has to be connected closer to the theoretics conceptual of 'implicte' that "matter and motion", and the transformation from measured and/or simulated data-input into an confinement (neutral field?) of modular theoretics. So far this 'reasoning' resp. in meaning of relativ-neutral point of physicals is'nt found find by/of 'implicte sero/zero'. Does this appoint an meta'physics is some more 'meta-philosphies' about(?). The implicte refuse the paradox is from that reality of established fabric (of human and living) represented in that 'les art pour le art', is anyhow the 'mutual induce' (impetus by Aristoteles) that was in difference to Plato opend concept. The difference of idea resp. proportionals by Platons is by Aristoteles /'nus (o.a.)'/ the implicite prim(i)ary order inherit the principles. <br />So far the human reasoning = science formular is more complicated for sure, and unfortunately? the physical reals are implicte 'matter and motion'. I do not think that there will be any solved (only) magnetical-fundamentals of motion / form expressive. I think the mathematical methods are not consistent to the real-physical reasoning data , so the relative resulting (technical) representations is in question about the real of complex matter and motion of all dimensions from the materia being .... <br />As You mention is there an very unreasoning part of science within the wrong caused by the un'known of that great function's creation in potency. <br /><br />... ;-) to You +Mauro Mezzetti <br /> AHL Mithraheehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16440482096020291443noreply@blogger.com